A school that has an influential culture is as much a lie as claiming that it has the best culture. As a result, cynicism was rampant, turnover was high, and relevant discussions took place not in the boardroom, but at the water cooler. The experiences of racism that students otherwise experience in an anti-racist text are potentially influential. The hope, of course, is that this preparation and exposure will strengthen the students, and they will then be able to access the resources they need to train young people. Some teachers may want to harm their students, as is often the case when the opportunity presents itself to strengthen and liberate them.
In many ways, faculty are guided by their student’s beliefs and backgrounds as they define the college experience. White students are more numerous than students who identify as underrepresented minorities. Because white students, especially faculty, predominate at Brown, students of color find themselves at a disadvantage, as they struggle to find mentors who can relate fully to their experiences. It is difficult for students to question teachers teaching methods and thus multiply when students of color face barriers represented by the whiteness of the teachers.
According to Spillman, this means that from start to finish, they feel alienated and excluded from the message and meaning of a piece of literature, which means that they could be prohibited from the beginning. White teachers in predominantly white schools, where all teachers are white, often feel unable to get white teachers to understand how even an anti-racist play or literature can lead to an experience that amounts to racial trauma. The assumption is that children are running with the book, so teachers need to explain and process to avoid the experience of becoming a racist attack on the student, “she” said.
The experiences of children of color are expected to vary considerably. Teachers who do not share the cultural background of their students should never assume to know what students feel in response to the racism directed against them. Such assumptions deny students themselves the unique qualities of their relationships with teachers, which can mitigate or exacerbate adverse reactions. First, it is wise to measure the norms and beliefs that characterize a school.
An analysis of the employee’s language is used when describing the culture of their school- if the culture was collaborative, entrepreneurial-bedded, or entrepreneurial. Secondly, by measuring how the tasks in the school were performed, and the cultural topics the employees discussed in their Glassdoor reviews, and thirdly, whether they exhibited a high degree of intrapersonal or cultural diversity. It shows that interpersonal and cultural diversity made it more difficult for employees to coordinate with each other and reduced the efficiency of the school relative to the return on investment.
A modern approach to measuring culture, using a method that allows researchers to test the relationship between cultural group and individualism and the role of cultural diversity in solving problems. The CSC theory assumes that the social environment and culture are complex and contain references to individualism and collectivism. It is these references that point to one or the other, that determine the tendency towards cultural groups or individuals or collectivism. In the best-case scenario, understanding essential cultural dimensions allows teachers to assign an individual’s references to the cultural profile of a particular school. If the fit is secure, the best results will occur. When cultures are evaluated with high-quality instruments of aesthetic evaluation, they are compared with each other.
Results suggest that effective hiring strategies should be pursued for companies that can adapt quickly to a changing culture. Advocates of cultural diversity in teams assume that it leads to cognitive diversity, but there is no evidence that this promotes team performance. Part of the problem is that studies have used imperfect proxies, such as self-proclaimed beliefs and values.
This fact, in turn, invariably challenges philosophy and literature to deconstruct these areas, to reactivate marginalized cultural experiences consciously, and finally to dissolve zones of cultural exclusion. Since the construction and deconstruction of such zones also take place in contemporary cultural spaces, the study of the mechanisms of interaction between different cultures is quite essential. Consider the form of famous sayings, proverbs, and maxims. All these are forms of wisdom that continue to circulate at a certain level within contemporary social structures.
Cultures have to adapt to situations where elements of their systems have been deliberately forgotten for one reason or another. This reactivation leads to the creation of new codes for previously reupdated phenomena, which inevitably acquire new meanings and functions. These codes are lost, and the new system is often subjectively understood as reconstruction or memory. In this way, individuals can confirm the importance of reinterpreting cultural experiences in the context of a new cultural context. In a correlation, traditional research on cultural differences by comparing cultural groups that differ considerably in their emphasis on individualism and collectivism.
Research carried out seven studies examining the differences between the two groups in terms of their social and political systems. While the former differed in many ways, including the language spoken in their communities, it also turned out to be a collectivist culture that valued community bonds and group solidarity.
Mary Pipher is not the only one who believes we live in a dysfunctional and toxic culture. Many people who have studied this culture say that it is a very sick and addictive culture, and it reinforces the idea of individualism, selfishness, and complacency, which leads people to develop what is otherwise known as prosperity. Some even believe that every family has its own culture.